Your rights and section 50 Police Reform Act

3 May

dboad 1If you are stop and searched or to held in a kettle, you DO NOT have to give police your name and address. The police will often ask for your details in these situations, but you DO NOT have to provide them.

However, under section 50 of the Police Reform Act the police DO have powers to take your name and address (but not date of birth) IF they reasonably believe you have engaged in anti-social behaviour. Anti-social behaviour (ASB)is defined as doing something likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress to others.

Section 50 powers are sometimes used by the police as a routine or blanket means of obtaining names and addresses, especially during stop and searches. But if the police do not have a genuine and reasonable belief that the person they are dealing with has been involved with ASB, the use of this power would be unlawful.

If you are told to give your details under ‘section 50’:

  • Clarify that they are using s50 Police Reform Act. If possible, record them saying this. In some circumstances the police have subsequently denied using s50 powers, claiming that people gave their details voluntarily.
  • Ask them to tell you exactly what they believe you have done that constitutes anti-social behaviour. They must have a reasonable belief that you did something likely to cause ‘harassment, alarm or distress’.
  • If possible film what they do, or record what they say on your mobile phone.
  • It is not enough for the police to say they believe you are ‘going to’ engage in anti-social behaviour. Section 50 powers do not apply to possible future actions – only if a person ‘has been acting, or is acting in an anti-social manner’.

Refusing to give your details under section 50:

  • If you refuse to give your name and address you may be arrested, but this is not always the case.  Even though the police may threaten to arrest for not providing details they do not always do so.
  • If you are arrested, you may be taken to a police station and charged with an offence under s50. However, in some cases the police have been known to ‘de-arrest’ if a person gives their details after arrest.
  • If you are prosecuted, the police will have to provide some evidence to the court that they reasonably believed you had been engaged in anti-social behaviour. If they cannot do this, you should not be convicted.
  • If you are convicted you may be fined, but you cannot be imprisoned for breaching section 50.
  • Giving a false or inaccurate name and address is also an offence under section 50.

A number of people arrested under s50 have taken civil actions against the police for damages. If you are unlawfully arrested for not giving your details, you may be able to claim compensation. Contact Green & Black Cross or Netpol if you want to explore doing this.  It may help if you have an audio or video record of the incident.

Note: Behaviour ‘likely to cause harassment, alarm and distress’ is a very broad definition, and the courts have allowed the police to extend it to all sorts of behaviour, including (in some circumstances) swearing.

You may be interested in a previous post exploring how the police use section 50 powers.


6 Responses to “Your rights and section 50 Police Reform Act”

  1. jth 03/05/2013 at 13:14 #

    it could be a better bet to have prepared a convincing false name and address to give them as soon as they ask you (so before they ask you using powers such as s50), as far as i know this isn’t an offence, its only an offence to do so when arrested or using powers such as s50.

  2. projectbrainsaver 03/05/2013 at 15:48 #

    Reblogged this on BattlePage.

  3. SteveJ 19/05/2013 at 21:11 #

    “Swearing” is NOT, nor ever has been, an offence.

    A few years ago i was challenged by a friend to look into the true meaning of “Causing Harassment, Alarm or Distress”. Looking through the original White and Green Papers for the Public Order Acts (primarily s5) i found that this required the “threat of unlawful violence” (originating in the basis of the common law “Breach of the Peace” which s5 of the Public Order Act 1936 attempted to correct to include third parties).

    The result: “Swearing” has been an intended misinterpretation by the police and courts of s5 POA1986 – ‘using words or behaviour likely to cause…’, which is NOT the offence. Causing Harassment, alarm or Distress BEGINS with a threat of unlawful violence – without it, there is no offence committed.

    Though, it is true the courts and police DO NOT DO LAW NOR JUSTICE.



  1. Great Articles For Your Weekend Intellectual Readings: Revealed- The Other Face of The British Politics & Society | Jerusalem Group [est. 1432] - 12/05/2013

    […] NetPol: Your rights and section 50 Police Reform Act […]

  2. Police powers finally kettled by High Court | WorldWright's … - 19/06/2013

    […] Susannah and other legal observers recorded that the police had told protesters they were using section 50 of the Police Reform Act. This gives police powers to demand details on threat of arrest, where they reasonably believe a […]

  3. High Court rules the police have no powers to force people to give their details, when held in a kettle. | Voice of Anti-Capitalism in Guildford - 18/02/2014

    […] Susannah and other legal observers recorded that the police had told protesters they were using section 50 of the Police Reform Act.  This gives police powers to demand details on threat of arrest, where they reasonably believe a […]

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: